Antiepileptic drugs lamotrigine and valproate differentially affect neuronal maturation in the developing chick embryo, yet with PAX6 as a potential common mediator.

Exposing the immature nervous system to specific antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy is linked to neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Newer AEDs like lamotrigine (LTG) are hailed as safer, but recent epidemiological data suggest that even LTG carries a risk, although much lower than that associated with valproic acid (VPA), an older AED, which is also known to cause morphological alterations in the developing brain. Increasing evidence highlights cerebellar abnormalities as important in ASD pathophysiology. Transcription factor PAX6 is a key activity-dependent mediator and regulates crucial processes during cerebellar development. The chicken cerebellum recapitulates important characteristics of human cerebellar development, and may thus be suitable for the assessment of interventions aiming to modify maturation and cerebellar development. In the present study, exposure of chicken on embryonic day 16 (E16) to LTG or VPA resulted in decreased cerebellar mass and level of proliferating nuclear cell antigen (PCNA) for clinically relevant concentrations of VPA. However, both AEDs reduced cerebellar protein levels of PAX6 and MMP-9 at E17. Furthermore, PAX6 immunohistochemical staining of coronal sections of chicken cerebellum showed a significant reduction in PAX6-positive cell density and changes in cerebellar cortex thickness, mostly caused by the change in IGL-layer thickness. In conclusion, prenatal exposure to LTG or VPA provoked differential maturational changes in the developing cerebellum that may reflect some of the underlying molecular mechanisms for the observed human ASD pathology after AEDs exposure during pregnancy.

Chicken embryo as animal model to study drug distribution to the developing brain.

INTRODUCTION: Rodent models are routinely used to assess the safety and developmental toxicity of pharmaceuticals, along with analysis of their distribution. These models require sacrifice of parent females, have challenges in the estimation of the number of embryos and stage of development, and are expensive and time-consuming. In this study, we used fertilized chicken eggs as an alternative model to address drug distribution to the developing brain of two antiepileptic drugs, valproic acid (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) at two developmental stages. METHODS: VPA or LTG was injected into the allantois of the egg on embryonic day 13 (E13) or E16. Whole chicken brains were harvested at time-points of 5 min to 24 h and the concentrations of the drugs determined using GC/MS and LC-MS/MS, for VPA and LTG, respectively. RESULTS: VPA and LTG had distinct absorption and elimination phases and were found in the brain as early as 5-15 min after injection. Both drugs reached the brain in clinically relevant concentrations, with Cmax 10-30% of the calculated concentration assuming uniform distribution throughout the egg. LTG concentrations were higher when injected at E13 compared to E16. CONCLUSION: The chicken embryo model may be a suitable alternative animal model for preclinical drug distribution studies. It enables to easily approach antenatal development on an individual level, with a precise number of experimental animals, high reproducibility and low time and cost. Knowledge of the concentrations reaching the brain at different developmental stages with different drugs is important for the planning and interpretation of neurodevelopmental toxicity studies.